> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:50:18PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:26:54PM -0700,
travis@sgi.com wrote:
> > > Previous Intro:
> >
> > Thanks for doing this.
> >
> > > In x86_64 and i386 architectures most arrays that are sized
> > > using NR_CPUS lay in local memory on node 0. Not only will most
> > > (99%?) of the systems not use all the slots in these arrays,
> > > particularly when NR_CPUS is increased to accommodate future
> > > very high cpu count systems, but a number of cache lines are
> > > passed unnecessarily on the system bus when these arrays are
> > > referenced by cpus on other nodes.
> >
> > Can we move cpuinfo_x86 also to per cpu area? Though critical run
>
> I worry how much impact that would be? boot_cpu_data is quite
> widely used.
>
> > Wonder if this confusion is the reason for git commit f3fa8ebc
>
> What git commit (full id) ?
