Re: What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rob Landley
Date: Saturday, August 25, 2007 - 11:08 pm

On Friday 24 August 2007 3:36:54 pm Jan Engelhardt wrote:

Actually I hadn't looked that far into it.  Juggling seven things yesterday 
and offline most of today, and what I actually _noticed_ was that my 
miniconfig that had worked unchanged to build UML since 2.6.12 finally broke 
on a kernel upgrade, and I have no idea what the actual reason for the change 
is other than possibly aesthetics.  Oh well.

Now that I look I see that all the devices in this menu (at least in User Mode 
Linux) are actually virtual block devices (UBD, loopback, and ramdisk), which 
the menu help doesn't indicate.

Now I'm trying to think of a better user interface way of cross-referencing 
this sort of thing.  Network block devices live in the networking menu, 
device drivers for hardware live off in another menu.  What I really want is 
a way to dynamically create menus via search critiera: "Show me all the block 
devices"...

Also "here's a symbol, show me a menu containing everything else that is 
either required by or enabled by this symbol..."  That sounds like a more 
powerful abstraction, since the previous one is "show me everything that 
depends on CONFIG_BLOCK".

(I wonder if this would be a largeish rewrite of the menuconfig 
infrastructure?  Hmmm...)

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?, Rob Landley, (Fri Aug 24, 1:17 pm)
Re: What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Aug 24, 1:34 pm)
Re: What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?, Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Aug 24, 1:36 pm)
Re: What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?, Rob Landley, (Sat Aug 25, 11:08 pm)
Re: What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 12:41 am)