Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>
Cc: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, September 10, 2007 - 3:44 pm

> 


x86-64 has quite different time code (at least until the dyntick patches
currently in mm) 

Obvious thing would be to diff the boot messages and see if anything
jumps out (e.g. in interrupt routing).  

Or check with mm and if x86-64 is broken there too then it's likely
the new time code.

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Sep 5, 7:30 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andi Kleen, (Thu Sep 6, 7:31 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andrew Morton, (Sat Sep 15, 3:39 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Sep 15, 2:42 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Ingo Oeser, (Sat Sep 15, 6:58 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andrew Morton, (Sat Sep 15, 7:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Matthew Garrett, (Sat Sep 15, 8:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Dave Jones, (Mon Sep 24, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Phillip Susi, (Thu Sep 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Sep 7, 3:34 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Prakash Punnoor, (Sat Sep 8, 1:17 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Sep 10, 3:12 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 10, 3:44 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Sep 13, 12:38 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 25, 5:06 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Sep 10, 7:33 pm)