Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 12:38 pm

On 09/10/2007 03:44 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:

I reported too soon that x86_64 works. It does not work, it just takes
a bit longer before it freezes. There are message threads all over the
place discussing this problem with the HP Pavilion tx 1000, and it seems
the best workaround is to use the "nolapic" option instead of "noapic".
Using that, it is totally stable _and_ there are no spurious interrupts
that would otherwise break USB. Interrupt setup is a bit strange, though:

           CPU0       CPU1       
  0:        241          0    XT-PIC-XT        timer
  1:          1        736   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
  2:          0          0    XT-PIC-XT        cascade
  5:         14      10028   IO-APIC-edge      sata_nv
  7:          0         57   IO-APIC-edge      ehci_hcd:usb1
  8:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
  9:          4       2463   IO-APIC-edge      acpi
 10:          2       2795   IO-APIC-edge      HDA Intel
 11:        740     478806   IO-APIC-edge      ohci_hcd:usb2, eth0
 12:         42      19911   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 14:          5       7958   IO-APIC-edge      libata
 15:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      libata
NMI:          0          0 
LOC:    4617310    4617213 
ERR:          0
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Wed Sep 5, 7:30 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andi Kleen, (Thu Sep 6, 7:31 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andrew Morton, (Sat Sep 15, 3:39 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Sep 15, 2:42 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Ingo Oeser, (Sat Sep 15, 6:58 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andrew Morton, (Sat Sep 15, 7:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Matthew Garrett, (Sat Sep 15, 8:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Dave Jones, (Mon Sep 24, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Phillip Susi, (Thu Sep 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Fri Sep 7, 3:34 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Prakash Punnoor, (Sat Sep 8, 1:17 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Sep 10, 3:12 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Andi Kleen, (Mon Sep 10, 3:44 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Sep 13, 12:38 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Sep 25, 5:06 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Sep 10, 7:33 pm)