Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 8:19 am

> Well it's not my call, just seems like a really bad idea to change the

Strange since we've spent years changing error values and getting them
right in the past. 

There are real things to worry about - sysfs, sysfs, sysfs, ... and all
the other crap which is continually breaking stuff, not spec compliance
corrections that don't break things but move us into compliance with the
standard

Alan
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large f ..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 8:19 am)