Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Friday, October 24, 2008 - 11:53 pm

On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 07:58 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:


but..

(tbench/netperf numbers were tested with gcc-4.1 at this time in log, I
went back and re-measured ring-test because I switched compilers)

2.6.22.19-up
ring-test   - 1.204 us/cycle  = 830 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - doorstop                   (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 147798.56 rr/s  = 295 KHz  (hmm, a bit unstable, 140K..147K rr/s)
tbench      - 374.573 MB/sec

2.6.22.19-cfs-v24.1-up
ring-test   - 1.098 us/cycle  = 910 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - doorstop                   (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 140039.03 rr/s  = 280 KHz = 3.57us - 1.10us sched = 2.47us/packet network
tbench      - 364.191 MB/sec

2.6.23.17-up
ring-test   - 1.252 us/cycle  = 798 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - 1.235 us/cycle  = 809 KHz  (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 123736.40 rr/s  = 247 KHz  sb 268 KHZ / 134336.37 rr/s
tbench      - 355.906 MB/sec

2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1-up
ring-test   - 1.100 us/cycle  = 909 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - 1.074 us/cycle  = 931 KHz  (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 135847.14 rr/s  = 271 KHz  sb 280 KHz / 140039.03 rr/s
tbench      - 364.511 MB/sec

2.6.24.7-up
ring-test   - 1.100 us/cycle  = 909 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - 1.068 us/cycle  = 936 KHz  (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 122300.66 rr/s  = 244 KHz  sb 280 KHz / 140039.03 rr/s
tbench      - 341.523 MB/sec

2.6.25.17-up
ring-test   - 1.163 us/cycle  = 859 KHz  (gcc-4.1)
ring-test   - 1.129 us/cycle  = 885 KHz  (gcc-4.3)
netperf     - 132102.70 rr/s  = 264 KHz  sb 275 KHz / 137627.30 rr/s
tbench      - 361.71 MB/sec

..in 25, something happened that dropped my max context switch rate from
~930 KHz to ~885 KHz.  Maybe I'll have better luck trying to find that.
Added to to-do list.  Benchmark mysteries I'm going to have to leave
alone, they've kicked my little butt quite thoroughly ;-)

	-Mike

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Thu Oct 9, 4:17 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Oct 9, 10:40 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 10, 1:09 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 10, 3:13 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 10, 4:31 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 10, 4:55 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 10, 6:25 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sat Oct 11, 6:13 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Oct 11, 7:39 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 11, 11:13 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 11, 11:02 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 11, 11:33 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Oct 24, 3:25 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 24, 8:37 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 24, 9:05 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 24, 10:53 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 24, 10:58 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Fri Oct 24, 11:53 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 25, 12:33 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sat Oct 25, 12:52 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Oct 25, 4:13 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 26, 1:46 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Oct 26, 2:00 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 26, 2:15 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sun Oct 26, 2:27 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sun Oct 26, 3:05 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Sun Oct 26, 3:23 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sun Oct 26, 4:29 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Oct 26, 4:33 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Sun Oct 26, 5:23 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Oct 27, 2:29 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Oct 27, 5:06 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Oct 27, 7:17 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Oct 27, 12:11 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Mon Oct 27, 12:39 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Oct 27, 12:44 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Tue Oct 28, 3:24 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Tue Oct 28, 3:57 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Tue Oct 28, 7:00 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Mike Galbraith, (Tue Oct 28, 8:22 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed Oct 29, 2:14 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed Oct 29, 2:50 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Oct 30, 11:15 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Thu Oct 30, 11:40 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Ilpo Järvinen, (Thu Oct 30, 12:01 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Oct 31, 2:40 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Oct 31, 3:42 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Oct 31, 4:01 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Oct 31, 4:15 am)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Oct 31, 12:57 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 31, 1:10 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Fri Oct 31, 2:18 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Oct 31, 4:56 pm)
Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen., Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Sat Nov 1, 5:51 am)