Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » October » 3

Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Jesse Brandeburg
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 5:19 pm

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

This is the same patch I posted 7 minutes ago, except that this patch
without the e1000e changes applied before it will cause all sorts of
WARN's to be printed during normal operation.  If at all possible I
think they should stay together as a group to prevent un-necessary
noise in the logs.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC PATCH 00/12] e1000e debug and protection patches, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 03/12] e1000e: reset swflag after resetting har ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 04/12] e1000e: do not ever sleep in interrupt c ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 05/12] e1000e: fix lockdep issues, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 06/12] e1000e: drop stats lock, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:19 pm)
[RFC PATCH 09/12] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
[RFC PATCH 10/12] e1000e: Use set_memory_ro()/set_memory_r ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
[RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to preven ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
[RFC PATCH 12/12] update version, Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Sep 29, 8:20 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: export set_memory_ro and set_me ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Sep 30, 12:07 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 08/12] e1000e: allow bad checksum, Jiri Kosina, (Tue Sep 30, 1:38 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to pr ..., Jiri Kosina, (Tue Sep 30, 5:40 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to pr ..., Allan, Bruce W, (Tue Sep 30, 8:47 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to pr ..., Jiri Kosina, (Wed Oct 1, 6:29 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 11/12] e1000e: write protect ICHx NVM to pr ..., Allan, Bruce W, (Wed Oct 1, 12:13 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Jiri Kosina, (Thu Oct 2, 7:28 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Olaf Kirch, (Thu Oct 2, 8:03 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Oct 2, 9:27 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Olaf Kirch, (Thu Oct 2, 10:33 am)
RE: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 11:02 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 11:58 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Olaf Kirch, (Thu Oct 2, 12:07 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] e1000e: debug contention on NVM SWFLAG, Olaf Kirch, (Thu Oct 2, 12:08 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Barnes, (Thu Oct 2, 3:23 pm)
[PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 4:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Jesse Brandeburg, (Thu Oct 2, 5:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Oct 2, 5:28 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, David Miller, (Fri Oct 3, 1:46 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Oct 3, 2:29 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jiri Kosina, (Fri Oct 3, 2:45 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Brandeburg, (Fri Oct 3, 4:28 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Brandeburg, (Fri Oct 3, 4:30 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jiri Kosina, (Sat Oct 4, 3:21 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Oct 4, 4:02 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Jesse Brandeburg, (Sat Oct 4, 6:24 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Oct 5, 1:51 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 5, 8:05 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Oct 5, 8:55 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 5, 9:02 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Thomas Gleixner, (Sun Oct 5, 9:16 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Oct 5, 10:01 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:, David Miller, (Tue Oct 7, 4:19 pm)