Re: kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:1726 in 2.6.24-03863-g0ba6c33 && -g8561b089

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Friday, February 1, 2008 - 12:51 am

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:35:56PM -0500, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:

Hi Kiyoshi,
 

you mean, end_that_request_last() isn't called when __end_that_request_first()
returns an error and this is the case only for fs and pc requests. Otherwise it
_is_ called, thus simulating somewhat the previous behavior. However, we never BUG()'ged
on residual byte counts before and this driver has been in the kernel tree for
ages, so what puzzles me now is how is BUG()'ing here better than before and
shouldn't we simply issue a warning instead of killing the interrupt handler...

..or am i missing something?

-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:1726 in 2.6.24-03863-g0ba6c33 & ..., Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Tue Jan 29, 4:58 pm)
Re: kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:1726 in 2.6.24-03863-g0ba6c33 & ..., Borislav Petkov, (Fri Feb 1, 12:51 am)
Re: kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:1726 in 2.6.24-03863-g0ba6c33 & ..., Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Fri Feb 1, 2:59 pm)