Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Saturday, February 2, 2008 - 10:37 pm

Why dropping add-mm-argument-to-pte-pmd-pud-pgd_free.patch though ?

It's a sane patch and a helps going further, and a total pain to re-do
later on. Besides, I may have some use for it on powerpc at some point
too...

Ben.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., schwidefsky, (Mon Nov 12, 7:30 am)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Jan 2, 1:44 pm)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed Jan 2, 2:24 pm)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Jan 2, 2:28 pm)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sat Feb 2, 10:37 pm)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Andrew Morton, (Sat Feb 2, 10:53 pm)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Martin Schwidefsky, (Mon Feb 4, 3:36 am)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Martin Schwidefsky, (Tue Feb 5, 7:39 am)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Andrew Morton, (Tue Feb 5, 11:46 am)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Martin Schwidefsky, (Wed Feb 6, 2:06 am)
Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables., Martin Schwidefsky, (Wed Feb 6, 8:50 am)