On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:20:38 +0100
Frank Seidel <fseidel@suse.de> wrote:

quoted text
> >=20
> > Wouldn't it be prudent to have a check that this is indeed a R5C832,
> > and a failure mode if it's none of the two known devices?=20
>=20
> Also thought about that, but as far as i can see this cannot happen since
> we only probe for those two devices and deny to continue if anything else
> /those two were not found in the beginning.
>=20

Can never be too careful though. :)

I've applied the patch for now. Feel free to keep digging and finding some =
docs for those regs though.

Rgds
Pierre