Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Haavard Skinnemoen
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 1:00 pm

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:19:37 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:


While I admit you have a point, I think it's easier to change the name
of that field than changing the hardware documentation at this point ;)


I know.


I'm not saying it's the wrong thing to do. I just think it's strange
that you alter a different register than the one you saved.


Yes, I do think we can assume VAL stays unchanged during suspend.


Yes, that looks better. Perhaps you used a contrast value that happened
to set the right bits when written to CTR?

I still think the name of the saved_lcdcon field is confusing though.

Haavard
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support, Nicolas Ferre, (Mon Mar 10, 6:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 13, 8:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support, David Brownell, (Thu Mar 13, 12:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Mar 13, 1:00 pm)