I didn't see anything fundamentally wrong with this... In fact it is
looking really nice notwithstanding the minor nits below.
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 02:58 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Could you define a macro for (1 << huge_page_order(h))? It is used at
least 4 times. How about something like pages_per_huge_page(h) or
something? I think that would convey the meaning more clearly.
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center