Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2008 - 12:32 am

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


hm, commit 4507a6a59cfc6997e532cd812a8bd244181e6205 does not exist:

  fatal: bad object 4507a6a59cfc6997e532cd812a8bd244181e6205

but i suspect it must be something along the lines of the known problem 
of really old gcc versions creating huge stackframes? Those pristine gcc 
versions were practically unusable for distro kernels anyway (and were 
patched by distros) - but i have no problem with restricting this 
feature to gcc4x. gcc4x creates more compact -Os code too, so it's 
recommended for smaller image sizes.


good point, fixed that.


yeah, instead of littering our include files with those quirks.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Mar 1, 9:19 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static, Alexey Starikovskiy, (Sat Mar 1, 11:26 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] acpi/battery.c: make 2 functions static, Alexey Starikovskiy, (Sat Mar 1, 11:42 am)
[patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Mar 3, 5:13 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Mar 3, 7:56 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Mar 3, 8:01 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Harvey Harrison, (Mon Mar 3, 8:58 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 3, 11:42 pm)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 4, 12:32 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Andrew Morton, (Tue Mar 4, 1:00 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Sam Ravnborg, (Tue Mar 4, 1:03 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Andrew Morton, (Tue Mar 4, 1:38 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Andi Kleen, (Tue Mar 4, 2:50 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 4, 9:46 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Mar 4, 11:07 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Mar 4, 11:09 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Mar 4, 11:14 am)
Re: [patch] x86: phase out forced inlining, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Mar 4, 11:18 am)