login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
11
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Randy Dunlap
Subject:
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
Date: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 8:19 am
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:46:31 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> > * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote: > > > Fix printk formats in x86/mm/ioremap.c: > > > > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t' > > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'resource_size_t' > > next-20080410/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:188: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' > > thanks, applied. > > > if (!phys_addr_valid(phys_addr)) { > > printk(KERN_WARNING "ioremap: invalid physical address %llx\n", > > - phys_addr); > > + (unsigned long long)phys_addr); > > is there really no way to solve this more cleanly than a forced cast?
I haven't seen any other decent solutions. This is what we do all over the kernel.
quoted text
> It > is a totally uninteresting warning that we pass in a narrower type to > printk(). It cannot ever cause any bugs or problems. Why does gcc warn > about it?
No idea about that part. --- ~Randy --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for April 10
, Stephen Rothwell
, (Thu Apr 10, 1:14 am)
[BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic while l ...
, Kamalesh Babulal
, (Thu Apr 10, 3:24 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Jeff Garzik
, (Thu Apr 10, 3:45 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Kamalesh Babulal
, (Thu Apr 10, 4:02 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Apr 10, 4:32 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Thu Apr 10, 5:03 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Jeff Garzik
, (Thu Apr 10, 5:14 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Thu Apr 10, 10:14 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10
, Greg KH
, (Thu Apr 10, 10:42 am)
[BUG] linux-next: April 10 - kernel oops at kmem_cache_a ...
, Kamalesh Babulal
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:07 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Kamalesh Babulal
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:25 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: Tree for April 10 - kernel panic whi ...
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:16 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10: generic pci_enable_reso ...
, Mariusz Kozlowski
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:34 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (ftrace)
, Randy Dunlap
, (Thu Apr 10, 3:07 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Randy Dunlap
, (Thu Apr 10, 3:09 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:46 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Randy Dunlap
, (Fri Apr 11, 8:19 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Al Viro
, (Fri Apr 11, 8:26 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: April 10 - kernel oops at kmem_cac ...
, Suresh Siddha
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:56 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10: generic pci_enable_reso ...
, Stephen Rothwell
, (Sun Apr 13, 6:48 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10: generic pci_enable_reso ...
, Greg KH
, (Sun Apr 13, 9:28 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10: generic pci_enable_reso ...
, Stephen Rothwell
, (Sun Apr 13, 9:49 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Apr 14, 1:12 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Al Viro
, (Mon Apr 14, 1:22 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Apr 14, 1:34 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Jakub Jelinek
, (Mon Apr 14, 1:40 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Jakub Jelinek
, (Mon Apr 14, 1:43 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Al Viro
, (Mon Apr 14, 2:30 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, David Miller
, (Mon Apr 14, 2:37 am)
Re: [BUG] linux-next: April 10 - kernel oops at kmem_cac ...
, Kamalesh Babulal
, (Mon Apr 14, 6:14 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
, Randy Dunlap
, (Mon Apr 14, 3:28 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
Og dreams of ke