login
Search
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.24, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.24, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-04-13 194 27 22 2008-04-07 188 29 22 2008-03-31 177 34 31 2008-03-27 171 38 30 2008-03-22 159 35 31 2008-03-17 148 38 30 2008-03-16 146 42 35 2008-03-14 145 45 39 2008-03-12 143 51 41 2008-03-11 141 58 43 2008-03-10 138 66 47 2008-03-03 115 65 49 2008-02-25 90 51 39 2008-02-17 61 45 37 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10449 Subject : mm/slab.c boot crash in -git, "kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2103!" Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-04-11 03:42 (3 days old) References : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.1/1209.html Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10428 Subject : [rc8] Regression: key repeats and skips in music during compilation Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-04-04 12:22 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/83 Handled-By : ...
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978 Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark regression Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-02-13 10:30 (61 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/12/52 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/18/81 Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117 Subject : 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot - dual-core Sony Vaio Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-02-23 18:55 (51 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/263 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/41 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/69 --
Soeren said it no longer happens to him in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/53 but unfortunately it still happens with me using -rc9. So I kidnapped his bugzilla report :-) In the bugzilla entry I said earlier today that "hpet=disable" apparently makes the problem go away (42 boots OK so far, whereas without this boot option it hangs ~90% using vga=6 and ~10% using vga=0x0364) I tried to bisect it, but sometimes in pre 2.6.25-rc1 kernels it takes 30 boots before the first hang to occur. So bisection is not reliable... If someone proposes a patch I will be glad to test it! PS: The similar bug in buzilla 10377 also appears to be "fixed" by using hpet=disable, see comment #17 in that bug. --
From what Mark Lord said in his comments #33 to #35 in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117 it appears that this is a much older regression, from april 2007. So this is a regression, but not from 2.6.24 (although somehow it never hit me before). I don't know about the policy of closing regressions that come from way before the previous kernel version, if there is any. Then I will let you manage the bugzilla #10117 as you see fit (but I will be "there" to hopefuly test any proposed patches). Thanks, Carlos --
I dropped the bug from the list of recent regressions, so it doesn't block bug #9832 any more. However, this still is a bug and regression, so the bugzilla entry remains open. Thanks, Rafael --
Soerens original report was a 2.6.25 regression.
And #10377 that was closed as a duplicate of #10117 was also reported as
a 2.6.25 regression.
#10117 seems to suffer from the common disease of people hijacking an
existing bug, but Soeren's issue that was what was originally tracked in
#10117 is (or was) a 2.6.25 regression.
If other people have similar problems that already existed in 2.6.24
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
Well, I'm really not 100% sure it was a regression from 2.6.24 and I'm not sure bug #10377 should have been marked as a duplicate. I made bug #10117 block bug #9832 again, but it would be nice to sort this out. Why do we think that the cause of bugs #10117 and #10377 is the same? Rafael --
cu Adrian [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/24/15 -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed --
Both of them probabilistically hang early in the boot. On both !CPUIDLE and hpet=disable seems to be working around the problem. Both are Core 2 Duo based with 64 bit kernel. One difference I saw was that #10377 fails on battery. That may be because when on battery CPUs may be running at lower freq during boot and that is probably helping this problem in terms of timing. Thanks, Venki --
FWIW, this macbook pro1,1 has only a core 1 duo, so x86 == 32bit... Soeren --
Sorry. When I said Core 2, I was referring to Carlos and his updates on #10117. Thanks, Venki --
Sorry, I meant that this could be something general and not a amd64 specific change... which I thought could be useful in tracing this... Soeren --
This bug tracks Soerens problem.
And the fact that Carlos and Mark discuss their different problems in
the same bug is just plain wrong.
We must learn to more aggressively point people at reporting their
issues in own bugs, instead of hijacking an already existing similar
looking bug (that might be for a different issue).
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
Ok, sorry then. I know something odd happened with bug #10117 as you so aggressively pointed out. In my defense I must say that I was about to report the hang with "ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)" to lkml when I read Soeren's post in this list. Then I did _not_ send the "me too" email and kept on following what was going on. So when I read that Soeren's bug was closed I wrote in the bugzilla that I was still seeing the same issue, and that I wanted to reopen it. I should not have done that and it You are saying it is a different problem, but it may be the same. Sometimes I had to reboot 30+ times before the hang could happen! And the last messages were _exactly_ the same. But let's not argue about that, I just wanted to help by pointing out that maybe the bug was being closed too early. In trying to I understand now, but you made me feel bad about it. --
Sorry for my wording, it was not meant personally.
It's a general problem in bug trackers that one person reports one
issue, and other people say "I have the same bug" and start discussing
their problem, which might or might not turn out to be the same.
And the result was e.g. here that Venki marked #10377 as a duplicate of
#10117 saying "Both are Core 2 Duo based with 64 bit kernel." although
this is not true for the bug #10117 was originally created for.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
... which you should realize that this is generally a _GOOD_ thing. This whole Linux thing is about doing things in a group, not about doing things separately. It permeates everything and it's our main strength. Analogously to nuclear fission and to torrent streams, bug handling needs a "critical mass" as well - the more testers, the better. (even if they end up having different issues) So i'd rather see bugs being mistakenly handled together (they are easy to separate out once they are established to be separate) than the same bug being processed on two different tracks. Your rigid, buerocratic view of this matter is wrong, harmful and it actively discourages testers. Please stop it. Ingo --
So I think we should leave bug #10117 to track the original issue (hangs on MacBook Pro1.1 w/ Intel Core Duo x86-32), reopen bug #10377 and use that to track the Core 2 Duo 64-bit issues. Any objections to that? Rafael --
Last I heard from Soeren, this was not reproducable on 32 bit any more. All recent updates on #10117 from Carlos is on Core-2 Duo 64 bit. If the problem is still reproducable on 32 bit then probably having 2 bugzillas to track is fine with me. Thanks, Venki --
I couldn't reproduce this one any longer... Soeren --
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
Soeren has confirmed this.
His bug (that was a 2.6.25 regression) seems to be fixed, and the bug is
#10117 seems to have comments about reported by at least 3 people other
than Soeren, and unless you are 100% sure these are for the same issue
each of them deserves an own bug.
Although it might sound like bureaucratic overkill having separate bugs
even for reports that might be for the same issue prevents situations
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
No objections on that, but I already took the liberty of doing exactly
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10082 Subject : 2.6.25-rc2-git4 - Kernel oops while running kernbench and tbench on powerpc Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-02-20 16:01 (54 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/20/218 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/18/71 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/25 Handled-By : Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10235 Subject : 2.6.25-rc5: Blank Screen with Intel 945 Submitter : Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com> Date : 2008-03-12 12:02 (33 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/12/290 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/1/318 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Subject : [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc6 - kernel BUG at fs/mpage.c:476! on powerpc Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-03-20 13:13 (25 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/20/39 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10300 Subject : volume wheel does not work in 2.6.25-rc6 Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-03-21 11:42 (24 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/94 --
-- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si Ud. no es el destinatario indicado, le informamos que cualquier forma de distribución, reproducción o uso de esta comunicación y/o de la información contenida en la misma están estrictamente prohibidos por la ley. Si Ud. ha recibido esta comunicación por error, por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente contestando a este mensaje y proceda a continuación a destruirlo. Gracias por su colaboración. This communication contains confidential information. It is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited by law. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10323 Subject : panic using bridging on linus kernel 2.6.25-rc6 Submitter : Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Date : 2008-03-25 11:40 (20 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10302 Subject : 2.6.25-git regression with snd-hda-intel on Dell XPS M1330, no analog sound Submitter : Andre Tomt <andre@tomt.net> Date : 2008-03-21 20:03 (24 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/21/295 Handled-By : Matthew Ranostay <mranostay@embeddedalley.com> Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10319 Subject : MacBookPro1,1: on resume (from console) s2ram -f -p does not anymore give me my display back Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-03-25 04:44 (20 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/2/496 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/6/1 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/40 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/51 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/13/73 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10344 Subject : [2.6.25-rc6] possible regression: X server dying Submitter : Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> Date : 2008-03-24 23:38 (21 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/24/260 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> --
I have reproduced the issue on kernel 2.6.22.17, so it looks like it's not a kernel regression, but an X server issue. Thanks, Tilman
Thanks for the update. I've dropped it from the list of recent regressions. Thanks, Rafael --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10369 Subject : The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7 Submitter : Chr <chunkeey@web.de> Date : 2008-03-30 21:09 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/30/87 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> --
The problem still persists and I have no clue at all what's the root cause. The symptom is a stuck local apic timer interrupt as we have seen it on those AMD X2 systems with C1E enabled. This box does not advertise C1E, but the behaviour is the same. Christian, it would be great if you could bisect the git tree so we get an idea which patch is exposing this problem. My feeling is that the problem itself is there with 2.6.24 as well but not exposed. That's just a gut feeling and I could be wrong as usual. Thanks, tglx --
Ok! The biggest problem however is: I can only run bisects on weekends. :-( And even then: it takes up to 2 hours until the timer gets stuck... and the system freezes... But, on the other hand... does ANYBODY know a way how I can see if the apictimer drifts/(getting slower and slower)? Regards, Chr. --
Well, it does not drift. It's stopped by some magic, but I do not understand why we do not see that behaviour in 2.6.24. The code logic in this area is really unchanged. Can you disable CPUIDLE for a test please ? Thanks, tglx --
Yep, I will disable CPUIDLE and report back on friday night/saturday afternoon CEST. (maybe, bisect too... with a bit of luck, I can do it better than log(n) ;-) ) Regards, Christian --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10393 Subject : ext4 compile error on m68k Submitter : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Date : 2008-04-05 03:30 (9 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/5/19 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/13 --
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10133 Subject : INFO: possible circular locking in the resume Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-02-27 (47 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/479 Handled-By : Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10427 Subject : e1000e broke e1000 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-04-08 20:39 (6 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/8/256 Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15704&amp;action=view --
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10156 Subject : KVM &amp; Qemu crashed with infinite recursive kernel loop in the guest Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-02-28 11:25 (46 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/28/106 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10377 Subject : Kernel usually freezes during boot when AC is unplugged - unless CPU_IDLE=n - Asus A6JC Submitter : Roman Jarosz <kedgedev@centrum.cz> Date : 2008-04-01 16:23 (13 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10153 Subject : (regression) kernel/timeconst.h bugs with HZ=128 Submitter : David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> Date : 2008-02-26 19:32 (48 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/294 Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15114&amp;action=view http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15115&amp;action=view --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10434 Subject : 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> Date : 2008-04-09 00:56 (5 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/10/409 --
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> This patch is in Linus's tree and thus the bug is fixed.
Hm, "git whatchanged net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c" returns
commit 7951f0b03a63d657c72c7d54d306ef3357e7e604
Author: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Apr 10 20:53:10 2008 -0700
[NETNS][IPV6] tcp - assign the netns for timewait sockets
as the most recent commit changing that file ...
It doesn't look like the patch has been merged yet.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> That's exactly the fix, what are you talking about? --
You're right, sorry (I was confused by the fact that Yoshifuji sent the message with it). Entry closed. Thanks, Rafael --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10449 Subject : mm/slab.c boot crash in -git, "kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2103!" Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-04-11 03:42 (3 days old) References : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.1/1209.html Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10421 Subject : Filesystem failing without any warning or etc Submitter : Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> Date : 2008-04-07 23:11 (7 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450 Subject : sh64: add missing #include &lt;asm/fpu.h&gt;'s Submitter : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Date : 2008-04-13 11:23 (1 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/13/171 Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/13/171 --
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10428 Subject : [rc8] Regression: key repeats and skips in music during compilation Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-04-04 12:22 (10 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/83 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> --
Yes. Still being investigated (mostly by private mails). Change that caused the regression after -rc5 has been located (see bugzilla), --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10412 Subject : BUG: scheduling while atomic: kmail/32546/0x00000003 Submitter : Plamen Petrov <pvp-lsts@fs.ru.acad.bg> Date : 2008-04-07 02:33 (7 days old) --
Well, as I wrote earlier, after I changed the motherboard of the PC where it first appeared - I haven't encountered it again. -- Plamen Petrov, network & system administrator Filial - Silistra RU "Angel Kantchev" http://fs.ru.acad.bg/ -------------------------------- this message is UTF8 encoded --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10391 Subject : 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> Date : 2008-04-03 15:06 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/3/283 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10365 Subject : usb-storage, error reading the last 8 sectors, regression in 2.6.25-rc7 Submitter : Sergey Dolgov <solkaa@gmail.com> Date : 2008-03-30 11:49 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/30/11 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10366 Subject : 2.6.25-rc7: warn_on_slowpath triggered Submitter : Bob Tracy <rct@frus.com> Date : 2008-03-29 17:29 (16 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/29/125 Handled-By : Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/30/245 --
Ingo, you have that patch in your tree, are you going to push that to Linus any time soon (ie. before 2.6.25)? Thanks, Björn --
well, it's the PCI code, which should go via Greg - but i can send it via x86.git as well. Have prepared it for later today. Ingo --
Patch verified to work on -rc8 and -rc9. Did not test on -rc7. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Tracy | "I was a beta tester for dirt. They never did rct@frus.com | get all the bugs out." - Steve McGrew on /. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10320 Subject : rt2x00 does not associate or give scan results Submitter : Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> Date : 2008-03-25 06:04 (20 days old) --
This looks like another network-namespace regression.
icmp_send() does:
net = rt->u.dst.dev->nd_net;
The bridge netfilter code attaches a fake dst_entry to the
skb which has dev == NULL when passing it to IPv4 netfilter.
Pavel, do you have a better ideas for fixing this than
instantiating a dst_entry in br_netfilter.c for every
device (or at least for every namespace)?
--
[CC list trimmed slightly] The description of the problem was not entirely correct, the bridge-netfilter dst_entry does have a proper device pointer, it points to a dummy net_device structure however that doesn't have a namespace associated with it. This blows up in __ip_route_output_key. --
For now I suggest this fix. Andy, could you please test whether it fixes the problem?
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Even though we don't have a test report back yet, I've applied this, thanks Patrick. --
I'm guessing it will. I've been testing my older kernels today and somehow I'm unable to reproduce the original problem, so I need to figure out what is different about my config now and before. I'll definitely post back when I test this, but I wanted to make sure you guys knew I was at least trying it. :) --
I just got done testing 159d83363b629c91d020734207c1bc788b96af5a and I can confirm that is resolves my issue. --
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian | [RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? |