On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
quoted text
>
>  * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>  > > > this is the only call to memory_present() we do in 32-bit arch
>  > > > setup, so it's required.
>  > >
>  > > We could clip there if SPARSEMEM is configured. I wonder if this
>  > > affects other platforms that need HIGHMEM support?
>  >
>  > clip where and what?
>
>  i.e. as per my previous argument i'd consider the need to sanitize the
>  calls in the architecture fundamentally wrong.
>
>  whether the core code emits a warning or allows the call is an
>  additional question i mention in the changelog - but the core sparse
>  memory code should _definitely_ not silently overflow a key internal
>  array ... (of which data structure the architecture code is not even
>  aware of)

or you can move that check into find_max_pfn for x86_32? so it will
not affect other platform regarding Christoph's concern?

YH
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/