login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
18
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Andrew Morton
Subject:
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 11:10 pm
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:49:08 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on > > an 8-way x86_64 box and: > > > > > > stack-protector: > > > > Testing -fstack-protector-all feature > > No -fstack-protector-stack-frame! > > -fstack-protector-all test failed > > do you have a stack-protector capable GCC? I guess not. > > This is a catch-22. You do not have stack-protector. Should we make that > a silent failure? or do you want to know that you don't have a security > feature you thought you had.... complaining seems to be the right thing to do imo.
A #warning sounds more appropriate. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Greg KH
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Dan Williams
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Kay Sievers
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 9:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Apr 17, 10:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:10 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:56 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:09 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:19 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:25 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:37 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:50 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, James Morris
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:46 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:02 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:27 am)
Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not loo ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:47 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:55 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Alan Stern
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)
Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:54 pm)
2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Mon Apr 28, 11:44 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:39 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:43 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 8:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 9:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:37 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Apr 30, 4:16 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 041/196] kobject: add kobject_init_and_add function
Lukas Hejtmanek
Re: Another libata error related to OCZ SSD
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 023/196] MCP_UCB1200: Convert from class_device to device
Florian Fainelli
Re: System clock runs too fast after 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28.1 upgrade
Christoph Lameter
[patch 1/4] mmu_notifier: Core code
git
:
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add strbuf_initf()
John Bito
[EGIT] Push to GitHub caused corruption
Jakub Narebski
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: patch view
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] When a remote is added but not fetched, tell the user.
Andy Parkins
Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ahci: Workaround HW bug for SB600/700 SATA controller PMP support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (11086): au0828: rename macro for currently non-function VBI support
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ceph: client types
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ceph: on-wire types
Linux Kernel Mailing List
crypto: chainiv - Use kcrypto_wq instead of keventd_wq
linux-netdev
:
Andrew Morton
Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14969] New: b44: WOL does not work in suspended state
Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Re: [PATCH 03/13] stmmac: add the new Header file for stmmac platform data
Taku Izumi
[PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: add registers etc. printout code just before resetting adapters
Eric Dumazet
rps: some comments
Thomas Gleixner
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
openbsd-misc
:
Stephan Andreas
problems with login after xlock in OpenBSD release 4.7
pmc
Make A Change. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Treatment
ropers
Re: what exactly is enc0?
Fuad NAHDI
Re: What does your environment look like?
Matthew Szudzik
Typo on OpenBSD 4.4 CD Set
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate