Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:44:13 +0100 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
>
> > Not all architectures and configurations define CPU topology information.
> > This can result in an empty topology directory in sysfs, and requires
> > in-kernel users to protect all uses with #ifdef - see
> > <http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120639033904472&w=2>.
> >
> > The documentation of CPU topology specifies what the defaults should be
> > if only partial information is available from the hardware. So we can
> > provide these defaults as a fallback.
>
> powerpc allmodconfig:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c:655: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'void'
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c:655: error: expected ')' before '(' token
<snip
quoted text > gets it working, by tricking the preprocessor into expanding pcibus_to_node
> to itself, but it isn't exactly pleasing.
No, it isn't! But cputopology.txt does say these should be macros, not
functions.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add default CPU topology information , Ben Hutchings , (Fri Apr 18, 5:10 am)