Dave Hansen wrote:
quoted text > Oh, once we've let Linux establish ptes to it, we've required that the
> hypervisor have it around? How does that work with the balloon driver?
> Do we destroy the ptes when giving balloon memory back to the
> hypervisor?
>
Yep. It removes any mapping before handing it back to the hypervisor.
quoted text > If we're talking about i386, then we're set. We don't map the hot-added
> memory at all because we only add highmem on i386. The only time we map
> these pages is *after* we actually allocate them when they get mapped
> into userspace or used as vmalloc() or they're kmap()'d.
>
Well, the balloon driver can balloon out lowmem pages, so we have to
deal with mappings either way. But balloon+hotplug would work
identically on x86-64, so all pages are mapped.
quoted text >> I think we're getting off track here; this is a lot of extra complexity
>> to justify allowing usermode to use /sys to online a chunk of hotplugged
>> memory.
>>
>
> Either that, or we're going to develop the entire Xen/kvm memory hotplug
> architecture around the soon-to-be-legacy i386 limitations. :)
Everything also applies to x86-64.
J
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH RFC] hotplug-memory: refactor online_pages to s ... , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , (Wed Apr 2, 2:35 pm)