login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
8
Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Kok, Auke
Subject:
Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 - 1:47 pm
Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> i repeat, it took me more than an hour to figure out why there's no >>> networking on my laptop. Guess how much it takes for a plain user to >>> figure out the same problem. >> A plain user would have obtained a working distro kernel, putting this >> rare problem purely in the laps of people with highly unusual kernel >> configs... >> >> But as noted in the announcement, the fix is for this is to continue >> in the next step in the transition, then you only have one driver >> claiming those IDs, for any given config. No need for further Kconfig >> tweakage. > > i find it mindboggling and rather sad that you are still in denial :-( > > this is an obvious regression to me, with a very simple fix. No other > PCI driver breaks like this. We've got three thousand Kconfig options - > it is clearly not realistic for users to keep such details in mind to > avoid pitfalls. E1000=y && E1000E=m is uncommon but can easily happen. > E1000=y && E1000E=m simply makes no sense in light of the PCI ID > stealing that occurs if E1000E is enabled.
hence the patch that is in jeff's upstream tree that puts an end to this :) Auke --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 11:39 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:32 pm)
RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:43 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:51 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:04 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:06 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Dan Noe
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:12 pm)
showing which hardware is unclaimed
, Rick Jones
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:13 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:17 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:19 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:20 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Kok, Auke
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:31 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:33 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: showing which hardware is unclaimed
, Martin Mares
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Martin Mares
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:36 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Dan Noe
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:39 pm)
Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Kok, Auke
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:12 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:33 pm)
[patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regr ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:50 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:04 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:12 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Frans Pop
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:53 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Wed Apr 9, 4:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Bill Davidsen
, (Wed Apr 9, 5:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Apr 9, 6:40 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:57 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu Apr 10, 7:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Grant Grundler
, (Thu Apr 10, 10:55 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:04 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Chris Friesen
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:20 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:23 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:35 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Randy Dunlap
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:44 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Philip Craig
, (Thu Apr 10, 5:46 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:54 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:59 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:36 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 5:16 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Chris Friesen
, (Fri Apr 11, 8:40 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Fri Apr 11, 9:22 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Apr 11, 9:45 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Martin Mares
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:10 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:34 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 11:51 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Willy Tarreau
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:25 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Willy Tarreau
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:22 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Dan Noe
, (Fri Apr 11, 2:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 3:06 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Fri Apr 11, 3:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:00 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:05 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:15 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:43 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, david
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:58 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Sat Apr 12, 6:07 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Sun Apr 13, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ondrej Zary
, (Sun Apr 13, 2:34 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jun 9, 12:24 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Jesse Barnes
Re: [stable] [BUG][PATCH] cpqphp: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference
Greg KH
[003/136] p54usb: add Zcomax XG-705A usbid
Magnus Damm
[PATCH 03/07] ARM: Use shared GIC entry macros on Realview
Oliver Neukum
Re: [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Martin Schwidefsky
Re: [PATCH] optimized ktime_get[_ts] for GENERIC_TIME=y
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: Some advanced index playing
Jeff King
Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
Robin Rosenberg
Re: cvs2svn conversion directly to git ready for experimentation
Linus Torvalds
git binary size...
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Re: Challenge with Git-Bash
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
md: move allocation of ->queue from mddev_find to md_probe
Linux Kernel Mailing List
md: raid0: Represent zone->zone_offset in sectors.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] S3C24XX: Add gpio_to_irq() facility
Linux Kernel Mailing List
md: raid0_make_request(): Replace local variable block by sector.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
md: Allow md devices to be created by name.
linux-netdev
:
kaber
[PATCH 07/12] netfilter: xtables: change hotdrop pointer to direct modification
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 3/5] dccp ccid-2: Remove redundant sanity tests
David Miller
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] pcnet32: Remove redund