On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:19:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:Right, but so long as a subsystem maintainer doesn't publish his/her topic branches, and only sends out patches on their topic branches for discussion via e-mail, they're fine, right? They can just rebase up until the point where the patch goes on a non-'pu' or non-'linux-next' branch. Basically, this would be the subsystem maintainer sometimes wearing an "end-point-developer" hat, and sometimes wearing a "subsystem maintainer" hat. So rebasing is fine as long as it's clear that it's happening on branches which are not meant as a base for submaintainers. I believe Junio does this himself for his own topic branches while developing git, yes? And that's probably a good reason for him not actually *publishing* any of his topic branches, and only the 'pu' branch, which is well known to be a bad idea for folks to use as a branch point, since it is constantly getting rebased. Heh, can't really argue with your point here. - Ted --
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian | [RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | iSeries: fix section mismatch in iseries_veth |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | ixbge: remove TX lock and redo TX accounting. |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | ixgbe: fix several counter register errata |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | b43: fix build with CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST=n |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List |
