On Wed, 28 May 2008, Keld J=F8rn Simonsen wrote:Ok. Since the performance of bonnie++ deals with single threads/a raid1 would p= robably closely match it but yeah I could do that sometime. Not in particular, just I could never find this information provided anywhe= re that showed all of the raid variation/types in one location that was easy t= o read. The sequential input and output and re-write speeds are the most important. Yes, after the creation of each array, mkfs.xfs -f /dev/md3 was run to ensu= re a clean mount and cron was also off throughout all testing.
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian | [RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: Rss pro |
