On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:I think our mistake is the assumption that everyone who wants to contribute to the kernel wants to code, or that everyone wants to end up at the top of the major feature contributors list. For lots of people, we're going to be that experiment from college they never quite want to admit to later on in life. Looking at the KernelProjects link, bugzilla is at the buttom and janitors is at the top. I've always thought the janitors project was important, but maybe we want to change the emphasis around a bit. The regressions page on kernelnewbies is out of date, and there are many more howtos on coding than on bug hunting. It doesn't mention linux-next anywhere. I'm not picking on kernelnewbies, it is one of our best resources. But, going back to James' ideas, introducing people to bug hunting is a better way to involve them in the community. Maintainers are easier to interact with when you send good bug reports along with a clear way to reproduce it and perhaps a bisection Getting all of the above is often 95% of the work of fixing it, people are most likely to jump into the coding when they've found a bad patch and start to wonder if they can fix it themselves. Along those lines, how about a kernel bug hunting challenge. The top contributor(s) to creating bugzillas that get solved get a new pc, laptop, high end graphics card, ssd device...whatever. We could send the best testers hardware that breaks most often...everyone wins. Other prizes could include tickets to a linux conf of choice (not airline tickets, just free entry). One motivation here is to bring bug reporters from active distro communities into testing mainline kernels as well. -chris --
