James Bottomley wrote: [...]This particular problem seems fixable. Put something like this in the janitor faq: "Don't create patches that are whitespace-fixes, or similiar attempts to make the kernel adhere to the CodingStyle without actually changing the working code. The reasons are: * Any patch disturbs others working on the same file. So change must be justified by usefulness above mere pretty formatting. * The maintainer can run the code through pretty-printing software _when it won't disrupt other activity_. Such software will do a better cleanup job than you can, and with no human effort at. Please find something more useful to do than whitespace/style improvements on existing code." And if they do this anyway, just reject the patch with a pointer to the FAQ entry... Helge Hafting --
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Satyam Sharma | [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
