On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:17:19PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:We did have some technical topics last year. So I don't think the KS will ever be purely for process. I agree that sometimes face-to-face discussions are crucial to resolving technical issues. The problem is that we try to nail down the agenda a 3-4 weeks ahead of time, and realistically if a particular topic requires certain stakeholders to be invited, we need to decide that we're going to do that topic at least 8-9 weeks in advance, maybe more, so those people can make travel plans and/or get travel approvals. And there is always the chance the topic will resolve itself via e-mail. So the trick is being able to identifying the topics where a face-to-face discussion really will be useful. First of all, if there is interest in holding some topic-area specific mini-summits on Sunday before the Kernel Summit, we may be able to scare up some space. So if there is interest, please let me know. Secondly, one of the things which has been suggested in the past is that we move the BOF's into an afternoon session slot, and maybe push the last session to run until 7pm, perhaps. That might make it easier for people to attend BOF's on the spur of the moment --- which might be useful in some cases where there is only 10 or so people you need to hash our some issue. And, of course, we try to schedule plenty of break time so that some of these discussions can happy in the hallway. Do any of these possibilities sound particularly attractive or likely to address your concerns? If so, which ones do you think we should try this year, as an experiment? - Ted --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
