On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:58 -0700, David Miller wrote:Actually, it was wrong of me to give that impression. The summit is also all about technical discussions. However, one of the observations made over the last few years was that it's hard to have a technical discussion that actively involves a majority of people in the room, so most of the technical stuff goes on either in the mini-summits (for discussions within maintainer areas) or in the hallway (for discussions across maintainer areas) or in BoF sessions. However, if there's a technical topic that would occupy the attention of more people than can conveniently be accommodated in the hallway track, by all means raise it ... it can be added to the agenda. That's sort of an extension of the hallway track (especially in Cambridge where there was a convenient pub across the road). I agree that having people face to face helps draw heat out of email discussions, certainly. My observation though (and it may not be universally held) has been that the majority of the frictions on the mailing list isn't necessarily coming from the core people who get summit invites. James --
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Satyam Sharma | [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
