On Mon, 5 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 18:12:02 +0300
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:35:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >...
> > > Thomas Gleixner (2):
> > >...
> > >       x86: olpc build fix
> > >...
> > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ config GEODE_MFGPT_TIMER
> > >  
> > >  config OLPC
> > >  	bool "One Laptop Per Child support"
> > > +	depends on MGEODE_LX
> > >  	default n
> > >  	help
> > >...
> > 
> > This patch not only excludes OLPC and code depending on it (currently 
> > BATTERY_OLPC) from all{mod,yes}config builds (where it built fine) 
> > but also makes it very hard for generic distribution kernels to
> > support the OLPC.
> > 
> > The commit comment does not indicate what the actual problem was, and
> > if this patch was sent to linux-kernel I must have missed it.
> > 
> > What exactly was the build problem?
> > Can we fix it in a less invasive way?
> 
> Also, it would've been nice to have been CC'd on this; I didn't see it
> until it was committed.

Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch queued
(via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to you. One
workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your patch we forgot
to remove the workaround as well.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/