* Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
quoted text > > we have an strace/ptrace fix pending in x86.git - but that should
> > not affect khelper.
>
> No, it comes from your pmd_bad_v1/pmd_bad_v2 debug patch, which Linus
> objected to, yet has crept into his tree nonetheless.
hm, the main objection was about whether to turn PAGE_SIZE from unsigned
into signed though - and that we didnt do.
regarding the mm/memory.c changes you did - that's something i proposed
before but didnt really feel positive about it because it affected every
architecture.
lets sort it out.
quoted text > I looked back through the mails and logs on that, and disagree with
> most of what was done there. Here's my pending fix below, but I've
> not yet tested whether it builds correctly on all relevant configs,
> nor whether my pmd_huge does what's intended, nor written the
> necessary comments, nor worked out the Cc list - I'm going out for a
> short while, all those will follow later, this sent as a heads up to
> relieve Jeff from bisecting.
>
> Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
i've thrown this into my queue to test it some more. I wont complain if
it breaks :)
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1 - pgtable_32.c:178 pmd_bad , Ingo Molnar , (Tue May 6, 8:04 am)