On Tue, 6 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> 
> hm, the main objection was about whether to turn PAGE_SIZE from unsigned 
> into signed though - and that we didnt do.

No it wasn't.

The main objection was that you SHOULD NOT USE PAGE_SIZE_MASK AT ALL!

You should have used a pagetable-specific macro, becuse PAGE_MASK is 
simply fundamentally WRONG, and has absolutely nothing to do with the PFN 
bits, whether sign-extended or not!

The fact is, the page frane number bits are *not* ~PAGE_MASK or anything 
like that. They share only the low bits - not the high bits.

			Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/