[git pull] scheduler fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, May 8, 2008 - 8:10 am

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:


ok, it's looking good here so far so here's the scheduler fixes tree 
that you can pull if my semaphore fix looks good to you too:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-fixes.git for-linus

also includes a scheduler arithmetics fix from Mike. Find the shortlog 
and diff below.

	Ingo

------------------>
Ingo Molnar (1):
      semaphore: fix

Mike Galbraith (1):
      sched: fix weight calculations

 kernel/sched_fair.c |   11 ++++++--
 kernel/semaphore.c  |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index c863663..e24ecd3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -662,10 +662,15 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
 	if (!initial) {
 		/* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */
 		if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
+			unsigned long thresh = sysctl_sched_latency;
+
+			/*
+			 * convert the sleeper threshold into virtual time
+			 */
 			if (sched_feat(NORMALIZED_SLEEPER))
-				vruntime -= calc_delta_weight(sysctl_sched_latency, se);
-			else
-				vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency;
+				thresh = calc_delta_fair(thresh, se);
+
+			vruntime -= thresh;
 		}
 
 		/* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
diff --git a/kernel/semaphore.c b/kernel/semaphore.c
index 5c2942e..5e41217 100644
--- a/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ b/kernel/semaphore.c
@@ -54,10 +54,9 @@ void down(struct semaphore *sem)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(sem->count > 0))
-		sem->count--;
-	else
+	if (unlikely(!sem->count))
 		__down(sem);
+	sem->count--;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(down);
@@ -77,10 +76,10 @@ int down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
 	int result = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(sem->count > 0))
-		sem->count--;
-	else
+	if (unlikely(!sem->count))
 		result = __down_interruptible(sem);
+	if (!result)
+		sem->count--;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
 
 	return result;
@@ -103,10 +102,10 @@ int down_killable(struct semaphore *sem)
 	int result = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(sem->count > 0))
-		sem->count--;
-	else
+	if (unlikely(!sem->count))
 		result = __down_killable(sem);
+	if (!result)
+		sem->count--;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
 
 	return result;
@@ -157,10 +156,10 @@ int down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long jiffies)
 	int result = 0;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(sem->count > 0))
-		sem->count--;
-	else
+	if (unlikely(!sem->count))
 		result = __down_timeout(sem, jiffies);
+	if (!result)
+		sem->count--;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
 
 	return result;
@@ -179,9 +178,8 @@ void up(struct semaphore *sem)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
-	if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
-		sem->count++;
-	else
+	sem->count++;
+	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
 		__up(sem);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
 }
@@ -192,7 +190,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
 struct semaphore_waiter {
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct task_struct *task;
-	int up;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -205,33 +202,34 @@ static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state,
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = current;
 	struct semaphore_waiter waiter;
+	int ret = 0;
 
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
 	waiter.task = task;
-	waiter.up = 0;
+	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
 
 	for (;;) {
-		if (state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE && signal_pending(task))
-			goto interrupted;
-		if (state == TASK_KILLABLE && fatal_signal_pending(task))
-			goto interrupted;
-		if (timeout <= 0)
-			goto timed_out;
+		if (state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE && signal_pending(task)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (state == TASK_KILLABLE && fatal_signal_pending(task)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (timeout <= 0) {
+			ret = -ETIME;
+			break;
+		}
 		__set_task_state(task, state);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
 		timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
 		spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
-		if (waiter.up)
-			return 0;
+		if (sem->count > 0)
+			break;
 	}
 
- timed_out:
-	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	return -ETIME;
-
- interrupted:
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	return -EINTR;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static noinline void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
@@ -258,7 +256,5 @@ static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
 {
 	struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
 						struct semaphore_waiter, list);
-	list_del(&waiter->list);
-	waiter->up = 1;
 	wake_up_process(waiter->task);
 }
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Mon May 5, 10:48 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 4:18 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 4:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 5:09 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:23 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 9:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Tue May 6, 9:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:42 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, J. Bruce Fields, (Tue May 6, 9:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Tue May 6, 9:45 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 9:51 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 10:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 6, 10:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 10:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 10:42 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 10:45 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 10:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 11:07 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 6, 1:28 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 7:11 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 8:41 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 8:59 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 9:46 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 11:26 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 6, 11:28 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Tue May 6, 11:49 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 12:05 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 4:00 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 4:46 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 5:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Wed May 7, 6:59 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Alan Cox, (Wed May 7, 7:35 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 7:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andi Kleen, (Wed May 7, 7:57 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:00 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:02 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:19 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 8:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 9:20 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 9:22 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:35 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 9:38 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:55 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:05 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:08 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:14 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 10:16 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:22 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:24 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:25 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:27 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:31 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:36 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:47 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 10:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 10:55 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 10:59 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:02 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:17 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:17 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 11:27 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:43 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:49 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 12:01 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 12:09 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 12:24 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 12:44 pm)
Oi. NFS people. Read this., Matthew Wilcox, (Wed May 7, 1:00 pm)
Re: Oi. NFS people. Read this., Trond Myklebust, (Wed May 7, 3:10 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 7:44 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 8:24 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:29 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 8:34 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 9:08 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 7, 9:17 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Wed May 7, 9:37 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed May 7, 11:43 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Andrew Morton, (Wed May 7, 11:48 pm)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 12:14 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 12:39 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 1:44 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 2:21 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 2:29 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Zhang, Yanmin, (Thu May 8, 2:30 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 8, 7:58 am)
[git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 8:10 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 8, 8:33 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu May 8, 8:41 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 8, 12:42 pm)
Re: Oi. NFS people. Read this., J. Bruce Fields, (Thu May 8, 6:43 pm)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:03 am)
Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:11 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:14 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 4:48 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 5:50 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 5:52 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:01 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:02 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:06 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 6:26 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:45 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 6:54 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:00 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Sven Wegener, (Sun May 11, 7:10 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:18 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:22 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:32 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 7:42 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:46 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 7:48 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Sun May 11, 8:19 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun May 11, 8:29 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 11, 9:47 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 7:11 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 13, 7:21 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 7:42 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue May 13, 8:28 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 10:13 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 13, 10:22 am)
Re: [git pull] scheduler fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 13, 2:05 pm)