Hi Paul,

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Well, with that modified version of your patch I posted, even if your
> previous PG_slab patches aren't applied, kobjsize() doesn't behave any
> worse than it presently does in terms of object size accuracy.
>
> In short: PG_slab doesn't get set and ksize() is never called, so we get
> the same degree of accuracy as the existing implementation, and the
> oopses get fixed (and the comments are still accurate, too!). So I think
> it's worth applying. Verified on all of SLUB/SLOB/SLAB.

Agreed. Can you send this to Andrew?

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
quoted text
> As for the call-site question, perhaps I'm misunderstanding your
> question. alloc_vfsmnt() is the first to call kmem_cache_zalloc() during
> boot-up on my system, but I'm not sure what relevance this has to
> anything? Accurately measuring kmem_cache_alloc() and static allocations
> is going to need quite a bit more of a re-think, but that's out of scope
> for 2.6.26. Presently I'd rather have my system booting first :-)

David already mentioned some (most?) of the kobjsize() calls can go
away and I think we should pursue that for 2.6.27.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/