On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 07:29:34AM -0400, Greg Louis wrote:The problem is exactly what you describe in your last sentence. Hardware manufacturers are well aware of that and make no effort to provide correct drivers when they (think they) have a monopoly in certain areas. What would be needed would be a public list of alternative hardware for known existing hardware. When big manufacturers will see their hardware listed there in the "bad" column, with their small competitors on the same line in the "good" column and with a lower price, they may start to think a little bit. Also, small manufacturers could use this for marketting purposes, because they would be listed as direct competitors for other well-established products. It should be made with notebooks too. It's a shame to see how you're nearly forced to have an nvidia graphics card in a notebook nowadays. It is needed to put a bad reputation to products which embed closed hardware, and to give a good one to other ones. If such a list is exhaustive and public, it may become a reference for new buyers. Willy --
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
