Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Michael Trimarchi
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 2:44 pm

[ sorry if this is going OT ]
 
Hi,
 
 
I'm working on a partitioned EDF scheduler right now, and I have to
face several issues, starting from the interface to use to expose the
EDF scheduler to userspace, and the integration with the existing
sched_rt policy.

By now I'm experimenting with an additional sched_class that implements
a SCHED_EDF policy, extending the POSIX struct sched_param with the
EDF parameters of the task, do you see any better way to do that? 
Could that approach be reasonable?

Michael


      ___________________________________ 
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!
http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot optio ..., Michael Trimarchi, (Wed Jun 4, 2:44 pm)