Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008 - 5:08 am

On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:


What the hell is wrong with you guys? I used to think it's accepted
practice to introduce a config option you can change away from the
default if you already know you are using new software that doesn't need
it, and if you are clueless just don't fucking touch the default until I
decide it's time to flip the default/remove the option because distros
are shipping new versions of the dependent software.

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Pierre Ossman, (Thu Jul 24, 2:58 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Johannes Berg, (Thu Jul 24, 4:38 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jul 24, 4:57 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Johannes Berg, (Thu Jul 24, 5:08 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Andrew Morton, (Thu Jul 24, 5:11 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jul 24, 5:22 am)
Re: 22bb1be4d27... breaks hal (and NM), Alistair John Strachan, (Thu Jul 24, 5:33 am)