On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:34:53PM -0400, Ryan Hope wrote:Well, if you're going to work on reiser4 (and I think there were other people who had also expressed interest/plans to work on it; you might try doing a search on the various mailing lists so you can coordinate with them and avoid duplicating work), my suggestion to you would be to find the comments that were made by the reviewers way back when, and make sure those comments have been addressed. Then, re-requests a code review, and promise that you won't abuse, and insult the integrity and impugn the motivations of the reviewers like Hans did, and hopefully after they review the code, fix those problems as well. Then you can try resubmitting for inclusion. Best regards, - Ted --
| Avi Kivity | [PATCH 08/54] KVM: Portability: Move unalias_gfn to arch dependent file |
| Jon Smirl | 463 kernel developers missing! |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
