Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit 64b context switch optimization?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <akpm@...>, <hugh@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <briangrant@...>, <cgd@...>, <mbligh@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 2:22 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

MAP_GROWSDOWN is unusable because we have to allocate the entire address
range for the stack.  Otherwise some other allocation happens in that
range and all of a sudden the stack cannot grow as much as needed anymore.

These flags really can be removed.  They should not be used because they
are outright dangerous.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkijJm8ACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHQ7/wCfcrLJPlKmtY5AC3c+fuX9LGe8
+YwAnRqLCdSQvwOUdsAz8Hq9H3dmnqEA
=BKsz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to rev..., Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Aug 13, 2:22 pm)