On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Langsdorf, Mark <mark.langsdorf@amd.com> wrote:On the first look the ACPI seems correct. The first two P00x objects have this PSD: Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000000, 0x000000FD, 0x00000002 } The other two have 0x00000001 at the third position. But as I don't really have a clue about ACPI, I'm attaching the complete SSDT so you can take look. Just ask, if you need the other tables too. Torsten
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
