* Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > Can we get the basics right first - drop the IRQ_EVENTS and HARDPPS
> > hackery out of the patchset and the core code then looks quite clean.
> > After that is sorted/merged we can come back to working out the best way
> > to improve the IRQ and HARDPPS hacks.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:31:15PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > hm, NACK on this line of approach. If then this instrumentation should 
> > be done at the genirq level (kernel/irq/*.c). Also, the #ifdefs are ugly 
> > - please hide them in include files.
> 
> Ok, I'll propose a new patch set without the IRQ_EVENTS part (or with 
> this support as last patch to be easily discarted) to get kernel 
> inclusion, but we had to solve this issue soon since without this 
> trick the PPS precision is quite low.

well, i didnt suggest you kill that aspect of the patchset - i suggested 
you change it to hook into kernel/irq/*.c instead of 
arch/x86/kernel/irq*.c.

That way all other architectures will benefit from it, not just x86. 
Doing an x86-only thing for such features is completely unacceptable.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/