On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > Ok, can we please
>> >
>> >  - *do* get a quirk for known-broken chipsets (at a *PCI* level, this is
>> >   not an x86 issue)
>>
>> the quirk work at the first point for David' system.
>
> That was not what I meant - meant the known-broken MMIO bar.
>
>> [PATCH] x86: protect hpet in BAR for one ATI chipset v3
>
> Now, this is probably fine too in theory, but
>
>  - you didn't check if the BAR is even enabled, afaik
>
>  - the other patch - to move the reserved e820 range later - should make
>   this pointless, no?

yes.

quoted text
>
>> >  - *not* get any more random PCI work-arounds that go through the x86 tree
>> >   and aren't even looked at by the (very few) people who actually
>> >   understand the PCI resource handling?
>>
>> stop working on following path?
>> [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4
>> [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4 - fix v2
>
> No, I think this is worth doing, BUT IT MUST NOT BE MERGED BY JUST SENDING
> IT TO INGO.
>
> It's not an "x86 patch". It's about the PCI resources.
>
> And those kinds of patches need to be acked by people who know and
> understand the PCI resource issues and have some memory of just how
> broken machines can exist.

i see.

YH
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/