Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, September 18, 2008 - 4:12 am

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


yes, -tip testing. I queued it up in tip/out-of-tree a week ago:

 commit 20e27c7b26792dbd9af0543c4bc86b5de5653a89
 Author:     Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
 AuthorDate: Wed Sep 10 17:12:45 2008 +0200
 Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
 CommitDate: Thu Sep 11 09:13:36 2008 +0200

    mm: fix tiny-shmem circular locking

in 7 days that's about 7000 random bootups, 20% of which had TINY_SHMEM 
enabled, half 32-bit, half 64-bit x86. It did not blow up in any way 
that would have prevented the kernel from building its next random 
version from within itself and it did not produce any kernel messages 
with various random kernel debug, compile and boot options.

So i think it's a candidate for v2.6.27.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths, Nick Piggin, (Wed Sep 10, 4:37 am)
Re: [patch] x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Sep 10, 4:41 am)
Re: [patch] x86: some lock annotations for user copy paths, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Sep 10, 8:01 am)
[PATCH] sysfs: fix deadlock, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 12, 2:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] sysfs: fix deadlock, Nick Piggin, (Sun Sep 14, 3:02 pm)
[patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Nick Piggin, (Sun Sep 14, 3:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sysfs: fix deadlock, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 15, 2:15 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Andrew Morton, (Wed Sep 17, 1:14 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Matt Mackall, (Wed Sep 17, 1:46 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 18, 4:12 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Sep 18, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Matt Mackall, (Thu Sep 18, 2:11 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Hugh Dickins, (Sat Sep 20, 9:12 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, David Howells, (Mon Sep 22, 7:54 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Nick Piggin, (Mon Sep 22, 10:32 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, David Howells, (Wed Sep 24, 11:18 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Matt Mackall, (Wed Sep 24, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, David Howells, (Wed Sep 24, 11:56 am)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Matt Mackall, (Wed Sep 24, 12:11 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, David Howells, (Wed Sep 24, 12:26 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Hugh Dickins, (Wed Sep 24, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Hugh Dickins, (Wed Sep 24, 12:41 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Andrew Morton, (Wed Sep 24, 12:47 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, David Howells, (Wed Sep 24, 12:59 pm)
Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex, Hugh Dickins, (Wed Sep 24, 4:43 pm)