Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
quoted text > [Christer Weinigel - Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 04:28:19PM +0200]
> ...
>> In my opinion, making platform_add_devices into a magic macro is
>> actually worse, since the same construct (array, ARRAY_SIZE(array)) is
>> used in many places, so one would have to do the same thing over and
>> over again for every function. In that case it's better to have to
>> learn one macro once, and the ALL_CAPITALS should make it obvious that
>> it is a macro.
quoted text > Well, can't agree with you :) It's my _presonal_ opinion.
> You could define it as
>
> static inline int platform_add_devices_array(struct platform_device **devs)
> {
> return platform_add_devices(devs, ARRAY_SIZE(devs));
> }
Won't work. You would have to use a macro. The above would turn into:
platform_add_devices(devs, 1);
or would if the __must_be_array check didn't catch it.
/Christer
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: kernel.h: add ARRAY_AND_SIZE() macro to complement ARR ... , Christer Weinigel , (Sat Sep 20, 9:38 am)