Linus Torvalds wrote:my current status mail was posted earlier today to lkml from this address, since then we've had a local reproduction and are going for number two. The reproduction seems racy, i.e. it doesn't happen every time, so we put it in a loop doing detect, check eeprom, detect, etc, and we'll see if it fails. Reproduction seems to consistently be around X probing time, no firm leads yet. As for Intel we have keithp and jbarnes as well as arjan, auke, myself and a few others involved. We have some patches to lock the nvm down, we'll be posting those tonight and tomorrow, I also have some debug logic (and fixes) to help prove that we don't think it's a race in e1000e. -- Jesse --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
