Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text >
> Of course, the 2048 PIT ticks is just a random choice. It could be any
> multiple of 256 ticks, so that error can be made smaller. Maybe it's worth
> spending 10ms on this, and get it down by a factor of five (at which point
> the error on the PIT frequency is probably in the same order of
> magnitude).
>
FWIW, typical error on the 14.31818 MHz clock (used as the PIT, PMTMR
and HPET timebase in most systems) is usually ±50 ppm. High-quality
motherboards which use a TCXO for the 14.31818 MHz clock would have
around ±1 ppm.
-hpa
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements , H. Peter Anvin , (Thu Sep 4, 11:30 am)