Re: [RFC 07/13] sched: Reduce stack size requirements in kernel/sched.c

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008 - 3:24 am

On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 16:50 -0700, Mike Travis wrote:

Yuck, that relies on turning preemption off everywhere you want to use
those.



BUG!

get_online_cpus() can sleep, but you just disabled preemption with those
get_cpumask_var() horribles!

Couldn't be arsed to look through the rest, but I really hate this
cpumask_ptr() stuff that relies on disabling preemption.

NAK

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC 07/13] sched: Reduce stack size requirements in k ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Sep 7, 3:24 am)
[RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Mike Travis, (Wed Sep 10, 3:47 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 10, 3:53 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Mike Travis, (Wed Sep 10, 4:33 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Andi Kleen, (Wed Sep 10, 10:21 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 11, 2:00 am)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Mike Travis, (Thu Sep 11, 8:04 am)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Rusty Russell, (Thu Sep 11, 9:55 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Mike Travis, (Fri Sep 12, 7:28 am)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Rusty Russell, (Fri Sep 12, 3:02 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, Mike Travis, (Fri Sep 12, 3:50 pm)
Re: [RFC] CPUMASK: proposal for replacing cpumask_t, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Sep 12, 3:58 pm)