Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 - 3:10 pm

On Tuesday 17 November 2009 15:37:39 Matthew Garrett wrote:


Wouldn't it be more reliable to hook into places where block requests are
issued/completed instead of queued?  This way you will not miss special
requests (some of them are quite common in practice and may take a relatively
long time to execute, i.e. FLUSH CACHE).

-- 
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device ..., Matthew Garrett, (Tue Nov 17, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed Nov 18, 12:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device ..., Matthew Garrett, (Wed Nov 18, 12:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device ..., Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Wed Nov 18, 3:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device ..., Matthew Garrett, (Mon Nov 23, 12:54 pm)
[RFC] Add support for events on block device idle changes, Matthew Garrett, (Fri Dec 11, 2:20 pm)