Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential write NFS workloads

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Steve Rago
Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 - 4:13 pm

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 22:49 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:


#2 is the difficult one.  If you wait for memory pressure, you could
have waited too long, because depending on the latency of the commit,
you could run into low-memory situations.  Then mayhem ensues, the
oom-killer gets cranky (if you haven't disabled it), and stuff starts
failing and/or hanging.  So you need to be careful about setting the
threshold for generating a commit so that the client doesn't run out of
memory before the server can respond.

Steve


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] improve the performance of large sequential wr ..., Steve Rago, (Wed Dec 23, 4:13 pm)