On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:32:38 +0100 Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:

quoted text
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:03:12 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> Why arent the relatime patches upstream?
> > 
> > They have been for ages.
> 
> I assume Ingo means the patches to make relatime update atime at least 
> once per day to ensure better compatibility with apps that do use or rely 
> on access times.
> These patches are already being included by several distros and, FWIW, 
> Debian would like to see them upstream as well because we feel .
> 
> They were last submitted by Matthew Garrett:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/27/234
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/27/235
> 
> Loads of people seem to want this, but even though it's been submitted at 
> least twice and discussed even more often, it never gets anywhere.
> 

Hard-wiring a 24-hour interval into the core VFS for all mounted
filesystems is dumb.

I (and others) pointed out that it would be better to implement this as
a mount option.  That suggestion was met with varying sillinesses and
that is where things stand.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/