On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:55:51AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
quoted text
> Sorry, I'm afraid that rsync falls into the same category as the
> kde/gnome apps here.
> 
> There are a lot of backup programs built around rsync, and every one of
> them risks losing the old copy of the file by renaming an unflushed new
> copy over it.
> 
> rsync needs the flushing about a million times more than gnome and kde,
> and it doesn't have any option to do it automatically.  It does have the
> option to create backups, which is how a percentage of people are using
> it, but I wouldn't call its current setup safe outside of ext3.

I wouldn't make it to be the default, but as an option, if the backup
script would take responsibility for restarting rsync if the server
crashes, and if the rsync process executes a global sync(2) call when
it is complete, an option to make rsync delete the target file before
doing the rename to defeat the replace-via-rename hueristic could be
justifiable.

						- Ted
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/