On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:26:58AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted text
> 
> How about having something like blk_ensure_cache_flushed() which
> issues flush iff there hasn't been any write since the last flush?
> It'll be easy to implement and will filter out duplicate flushes in
> most cases.
> 

I thought about such a thing, but my concern is that while this might
suppress most unnecessary double flushes, some intervening write from
another process might slip in which doesn't need to be flushed out.
In other words "in most cases" means that "in some cases" we will take
a performance hit thanks to the duplicate flushes.  So this isn't
something we should depend upon, although if we do detect back-to-back
flushes, obviously we should filter them out.

So if we did something like this, it would be good if we had a
debugging option which would detect double flushes, and printk a
warning identifying where the call sites first and second flushes (by
function name and line number), so that filesystem developers could
detect the double flushes, and work to eliminate them.

Does that make sense?

              	   	  	       	    - Ted
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/