On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:04:40 +0200
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:01:49 +0100
> "Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com> wrote:

<snipp>

quoted text
> > Remember however that you can leave the device generally non-private
> > and attempt as needed to allocate a channel for exclusive usage by
> > dma_request_channel()
> >
> 
> The weird part was that when testing this, the dma_request_channel()
> would not return any channel before DMA_PRIVATE flag was set. I think
> I did this some time ago, I can do a retest with the current 2.6.29
> and see how it behaves.
> 

On 2.6.29 I do not have to set the DMA_PRIVATE flag for
dma_request_channel() to work now. So I guess this patch could be
skipped.

I am quite sure I did the previous testing without any of the DMA
clients enabled. My original work was based on 2.6.29-rc3 IIRC. So I do
not really know why this was needed.

<snipp>

-- 
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/